Serving the scholastic field hockey and lacrosse community since 1998

Nov. 17, 2016 — When a playoff is not a competition

The concept of a postseason competition in any form of sporting endeavor is to identify the best person or team by process of elimination.

Ideally, this means closer games or races in a tournament or meet as it winds to its conclusion. But occasionally you get situations such as in last summer’s Olympics when Katie Ledecky won the 800-meter freestyle by 11.38 seconds.

Now, we’ve seen some lopsided results in field hockey tournaments over the years, starting a few years ago when a Northwest Virginia regional semifinal game got out of hand and resulted in a 14-0 victory.

And, there have been any number of 10-goal victories in the postseason where Voorhees Eastern (N.J.) is concerned. Take, for instance, this year’s Group IV state semifinal victory over Freehold (N.J.) Township, which resulted in a 13-0 win.

Last night, in the NJSIAA Tournament of Champions, both games had the “mercy rule” invoked, where the clock would continue to run if one team built a five-goal lead.

Let’s refocus your attention. This happened to two teams which had already won state championships in one of the elite field hockey states in America.

You’re also beginning to see a sea change in the level of competition in the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association. From the start of state tournament competition in 1974, only a handful of games in our back-of-the-envelope count ever went into “mercy rule” territory; there were four games which were 6-0 shutouts between 1974 and 2001 (except 1975, where there are no records available).

But in 2002, three teams scored six goals or more. That year, West Chester (Pa.) East set a high-water mark for goals scored and margin of victory in an 8-1 win over Red Lion (Pa.) Area. Those marks were exceeded when Allentown William Allen (Pa.) defeated Philadelphia Northeast (Pa.) 9-1 in the first round of the 2005 Class AAA Tournament.

In 2007, Malvern Villa Maria (Pa.) beat Dillsburg Northern York (Pa.) 10-0, which was one one of three “mercy rule” shutouts in Class AA alone; in the others, Mifflinburg (Pa.) beat Bellville (Pa.) Mennonite 6-0 and Selinsgrove (Pa.) stopped Big Springs Bermudian Springs (Pa.) 8-0. Over in the AAA bracket, Flourtown Mount St. Joseph Academy (Pa.) beat Allentown Northampton (Pa.) 8-0.

From 2010 until this year’s PIAA Tournament, there has been at least one “mercy rule” result, in which the margin of victory is five goals or more.

In 2016? Thus far, there have been nine. This includes a 10-1 Mount Joy Donegal (Pa.) win over Mount St. Joseph Academy, and 8-0 shutouts by Merion (Pa.) Mercy, Wilkes-Barre Holy Redeemer (Pa.) and Lehman Lake-Lehman (Pa.). Emmaus (Pa.) also rolled up eight tallies on Buckingham Central Bucks East (Pa.).

What’s going on here? I think it’s a case of, once again, a large gulf between the haves and the have-nots in scholastic field hockey, where teams with multiple players in the high-performance system are on another level of play altogether from their opponents.

But, I also think there’s also a winnowing away of the unwritten rules of the game, such as pulling a star player after a hat trick, not trying for goals after a team gets a five-goal lead, or the goal-scorer retrieving the ball after a goal is scored.

Is that progress, or is it the undermining of sportsmanship? I leave that for history to decide.


  Bob wrote @

I completely agree with the assumption that teams and or coaches are not adhering to the unwritten rules of the game to preserve sportsmanship. This exact topic has annoyed me for many years now. More often than not girls are scoring 6,7,8 and even 10 goals a game. This is completely uncalled for and unsportsmanlike. My daughter played for a team that is consistently mentioned on your website as a Top tier team and her coach followed those unwritten rules. Her coach would even pull the entire forward line if the score got to 5 or 6 – 0. Although this unwritten rule limited my daughter from ever getting to the goal totals of some of the girls listed on your site, it has taught her how to play with respect and sportsmanship.

  Al Mattei wrote @

Here’s the question, though. Do you personally apply the same standard to other feats of athletic endeavor? Such as, for example, the University of Alabama beating Mississippi State 52-3 last week in tackle football.

Thing is, varsity sports do not exist “to preserve sportsmanship.” In its simplest form, it is to win or lose on the field of play. Anything else imposed on it is artificial bread and circuses.

  Brendan wrote @

Can you beat a team 52-3 and still exhibit good sportsmanship? Most of the time the score isn’t a good reflection of the actual game. Do you tell a team to stop scoring just because the other team is unable to stop you? Even after you pull out all your varsity players and you still score, are you exhibiting poor sportsmanship? There is a lot of things to factor in.
As far as padding a players numbers, that’s another issue. That falls on the coach in my opinion. Players do what the coach tells them to do, usually without question. Players shouldn’t be penalized for what they are coached to do. What happens if a girls scores 100 goals in a season and half of them came in games against less than mediocre teams does that mean her record is not valid? Do you put a asterisk by her name? It just opens up more questions than answers.

[…] as we wrote last fall about the fact that nine PIAA field hockey tournament matches went to the mercy rule in 20… alone, it’s hard to know whether the fault lies in the possession clock, the rules written to […]

  Aug. 6, 2017 — The runaway PAHF | wrote @

[…] few months ago, we noted the gulf in scoring as exemplified by scores in the PIAA field hockey tournament. Whereas there were only four known […]

[…] year ago, we noted how many runaway scores there were in the knockout rounds of the Pennsylvania Interscholastic …, ostensibly the most competitive postseason in the […]

  Nov. 25, 2018 — Burning off the chaff | wrote @

[…] running that balance between rewarding the higher seeds and ensuring competitive games throughout. But, as we noted a couple of years ago when analyzing the trends in the PIAA field hockey tournament… it is an inexact science. And this especially goes in a bracket which has only six […]

[…] In 2016, I wrote this. […]

[…] you look at the semifinals and finals of the 5A and 4A title matches, you see something that we pointed up five years ago when we looked at the evolution of scores in the Pennsylvania public-school field hockey […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: