TopOfTheCircle.com

Serving the scholastic field hockey and lacrosse community since 1998

July 14, 2019 — To break a tie

In the sports world today, there were two unprecedented tiebreakers implemented in order to determine a winner after a tie.

One, in an individual pursuit, saw the Wimbledon men’s singles final determined by a tiebreaker, the vision of Jimmy Van Alen had finally come to the All-England Club after nearly 50 years. But unlike much of the rest of the world, this 12-point tiebreaker came only after Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic had played to a 12-12 game score in the fifth set.

The institution of the fifth-set tiebreaker came only after a couple of ridiculously long matches featuring U.S. player John Isner affected the scheduling of courts at the Club, including one which went 70 games to 68 in the final set in 2010.

The other tiebreaker came in a team sport, cricket. They held the final of the ICC World Cup, a competition featuring one-day international (or ODI) rules, where teams had 50 overs, or groups of six attempts, at scoring as many runs as they could by running in between two sets of stumps 22 yards apart.

In the final, England, the host nation, played upstart New Zealand. At the end of 50 overs for each team, the score was tied at 241 runs apiece. Now, I thought that perhaps the game would be decided in favor of New Zealand, since they spent only eight outs getting the same number of runs that England did in scoring theirs while expending all 10 outs.

Instead, the game went to what was called a “super over,” which saw each side getting six deliveries to score as many runs as they could. Oddly enough, the two sides each scored 15 runs off their six deliveries in each over, so the winner was determined by the number of times each team had scored either a four (hitting the ball to and over the boundary surrounding the Lord’s cricket ground), or a six (hitting the ball over the boundary on the fly). In the tiebreak, England won 26 to 17 on boundaries.

Now, I’ve seen some interesting tiebreakers implemented in sports like field hockey and lacrosse. But to me, the super over is something that shouldn’t be done just once. Instead, why not go for another super over and get a clear winner?

Or make it a really “super” over and have 10 deliveries per team rather than just six, and restrict the placement of players as in the “power play,” where teams score more runs than usual.

1 Comment»

  Kevin Parker wrote @

Yes, I was likening the cricket tiebreaker to saying in soccer that if they’re still tied after five PKs, the team with more corner kicks wins. Bizarre – no reason why they couldn’t keep doing “super overs” until there’s a winner on the pitch.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: